Suspicions of use of inside information, prior to it being available to all investors, are looming over a trade by which "Fondul Proprietatea" (FP) decided to reduce its stake in "Oil Terminal" (OIL), about two weeks ago, from 10%, to 8.45%.
The trade occurred on June 9th, three days after the meeting of the Board of Directors of "Oil Terminal", which decided to summon the Extraordinary General Shareholder Meeting (AGEA). The most important item on the agenda was the increase of the company"s share capital, with a contribution in kind from the State, through the Ministry of the Economy, consisting of two plots of land, one of 254,261 sqm and one of 129,334 sqm, located in Constanţa. The proposal is an important piece of news which could affect the investment strategy of the company"s private investors, as they would be forced to participate in the share capital increase with cash, or risk seeing their holdings diluted.
The increase of the state"s stake through the contribution of the two plots of land dilutes the other shareholders, meaning that selling ahead of the information being published gives the seller a concrete advantage.
Even though it was important, the information only became available to domestic investors on June 10th, when the notice to attend of the General Shareholder Meeting was published on the website of the Bucharest Stock Exchange. Meanwhile, however, (on June 9th), the Proprietatea Fund decided to sell 9.02 million shares of OIL, at an average price of 0.3681 lei/share, according to the report posted on June 10th, on the website of the Bucharest Stock Exchange. The sale seems to have been quite "inspired", coming after two days where the stock of OIL rose 15% a day.
In fact, on June 9th, the price of the shares of OIL reached the highest level since the beginning of the year (0.3685 lei/share). (At the time, the rise of the price of the stock of OIL, caused confusion among analysts and brokers who couldn"t find any explanation for the evolution of the stock, given the absence of news concerning the company"s activities).
On June 14th, when the shares of "Oil Terminal" resumed trading, their price fell 14.99%, to 0.3054 lei/share (the average price displayed on the website of the BSE). The Proprietatea Fund sold the shares of OIL on June 9th, at an average price of 0.3681 lei/share, for 3.32 million lei, gaining 566,203 lei, whereas, had it sold them on June 14th, it would have earned 2.75 million lei.
"The session of the Board of Directors of OIL for the summoning of the AGA, for the purpose of increasing the share capital was held on June 6th, and the Proprietatea Fund can"t claim it never knew that the General Shareholder Meeting would be summoned, since its representative, Istvan Kocsolade, attended the meeting of the Board of Directors. Without him, the quorum of the meeting wouldn"t have been met, nor could the meeting of the General Shareholder Meeting have been decided", sources which did not wish to be named said.
Such a situation represents a violation of the capital market legislation which prohibits "any person which owns privileged information from using the information in question for acquiring or selling, on its own behalf or on behalf of a third party, either directly or indirectly, securities which that information pertains to".
The buyer of the block of nine million shares was not reported on the Bucharest Stock Exchange. However, it would have been interesting to know who was so motivated to buy the shares of OIL, just as their price reached this year"s high.
The Proprietatea Fund and the "Broadhurst" investment fund have challenged the amount at which the two plots of land were valued by the experts hired by "Oil Terminal". This is why, at the General Shareholder Meeting of July 16th, the agenda includes the proposal to have the Office of the Trade Registry of the Court of Constanţa appoint an appraiser belonging to the ANEVAR (Romanian Association of Real Estate Appraisers).
Art.244, paragraph 1, of the capital market law, defines "privileged information" as precise information that was not made public, which directly or indirectly concerns one or more issuers or one or more securities, and which would significantly impact the price of those securities or of their derivatives if they were to be made public.
1. BIG disapointment
(message sent by Farmache on 24.06.2011, 21:48)
Incredible facts if proven true. We were looking to Templeton as a big chance to turnaround our exchange and what we get? Insider trading by the book?
Hope that shareholders of FP will terminate the management contract with Tempelton asap.
2. what is the penalty?
(message sent by investor on 24.06.2011, 21:55)
The article doesn't explain what is the penalty for that in Romania? If you can buy a romanian judge cheaper than the penalty, guess that Templeton has no problem.
Its a bigger problem at NY and London Templeton offices.
2.1. BIG deal (response to opinion no. 2)
(message sent by Farmache on 24.06.2011, 21:57)
They risk losing their licence in EU
3. lack of internal policies
(message sent by Mark shadow on 24.06.2011, 22:13)
Uk and Ro are the front-runners of Mifid compliance but Tempelton was lost in the translation.
The local manager can become a scapegoat but the main risk for investors in the romanian fund is the fight with local utilities barrons where they hold minority positions.
4. fără titlu
(message sent by anonim on 24.06.2011, 23:03)
Sell FP if you are disapointed but do not poison the potential investors