The Georgescu Illusion, Probable Disillusion

"At this time, the public image of Călin Georgescu is a collective construct fueled by the mass of citizens - he is a virtual, animated being".

This seemingly paradoxical statement is the key to understanding the Georgescu phenomenon. Unlike other politicians who assert themselves through a clear program, through administrative experience or through demonstrated performance, Călin Georgescu operates on the basis of a different mechanism: it is not his reality that matters, but the collective perception that constructs him.

In other words, Georgescu is not just a man, but has become a symbol. A symbol that no longer belongs to him, but to those who support him.

• How is a "virtual, animated being" born?

The Georgescu phenomenon can be explained by a combination of psychological, sociological and political factors:

1. Projection of collective hope - The population frustrated by the corruption, incompetence and stagnation of the political system is looking for an "outsider", a "clean" leader. Georgescu seems to fulfill this role not by what he has done, but by what people try to see in him.

2. Halo effect - His supporters attribute to Georgescu qualities that he has not demonstrated. He is perceived as a "patriot", "savior", "visionary", even if these labels are not based on concrete facts, but on a speech calibrated to reach collective emotions.

3. Distance from reality - Unlike active politicians, who have to make decisions that can be criticized, Georgescu has the advantage of not having been tested in any major administrative role. The lack of his own governance means that there are no tangible failures to drag him down.

• Georgescu1 vs. Georgescu2: The real and the virtual candidate

This mechanism creates a double political identity:

- Georgescu1 - the real man, with verbal tics, with questionable ideas, with moments of inconsistency.

- Georgescu2 - the collective image, animated by popular desires and aspirations, an avatar of national frustrations and the need for change.

No attack on Georgescu1 affects the perception of Georgescu2. Even if the first is criticized, dismantled or ironized, the second remains intact, being a psychological construction of the masses.

• Who else can compete with a virtual candidate?

The problem with this collective construction is that it is almost impossible to combat with traditional means. An ordinary politician can be attacked by revelations, by exposing mistakes, by dismantling his program. But a virtualized symbol, living in the collective mind of voters, is much more resistant to any kind of rational attacks.

• Conclusion: Reality vs. Political Illusion

Călin Georgescu, as perceived by the public, is not a person, but a living idea. And this type of candidate is extremely dangerous for his political opponents, who are forced to fight not with a man, but with a collective projection.

History has shown us that this strategy can produce surprise leaders, but also that, sooner or later, reality clashes with the illusion. Călin Georgescu will truly become a leader only when he is forced to leave the mythological zone and enter the arena of concrete facts. Until then, his image remains a collective creation, a political dream fueled by the frustrations of a society that no longer believes in its traditional leaders.

Read Why is Călin Georgescu unbeatable?

Reader's Opinion

write your opinion here.

Accord

By writing your opinion here you confirm that you have read the rules below and that you consent to them.

Anti-Romanian comments are prohibited.
- Use decent language.
The editorial team reserves the right to remove incoherent and vulgar opinions, which includes those with anti-social, obscene, and/or insulting content, as well as those that do not pertain to the article in question.
Stupid-aggressive comments are not allowed.
Incitement to social hatred and/or xenophobia, discrimination based on gender, age, or any other nature are not accepted.
Advertising announcements are not permitted.
Do not insert links or email addresses in the text of opinions.
Deliberate repetition of the same message (or variants) can be considered propaganda; propaganda in this form is prohibited.
- Threats of any kind are not accepted.
- Harassment of BURSA's journalists is not allowed.
- Defaming the BURSA Newspaper is prohibited.
- Revealing the identity of any commentator in the opinion section without their written consent filed with the Editorial Office is not accepted.
The use of the names of BURSA's journalists for the falsification of opinion signatures is not allowed.
Name substitution is not accepted.
The editorial team reserves the right to delete opinions and restrict access to posting opinions for those who are deemed to act in bad faith.
Violations of this regulation will result in the removal of posted opinions (an equivalent of self-censorship by the author of the message, rather than censorship practiced by the newspaper).
SPECIFICATIONS:
- All opinions express the views of the authors, not the administrator (except for messages written by the administrator); we do not take responsibility for materials posted on this site by individuals not authorized by the BURSA newspaper.
- Posting a message implies tacit acceptance of this regulation.
- If you request individual responses, please provide your real email address; we will try, within the available time, to answer all your questions.