The war of liberation from the captivity of Facebook

Octavian Dan
English Section / 26 octombrie 2023

Drawing by MAKE

Drawing by MAKE

Versiunea în limba română

More than 40 US states have filed lawsuits against Meta for creating addiction among young people

The European Union launched an investigation on similar topics

Social media platforms are increasingly facing problems due to the uncontrollable freedom of expression and the dependencies they create among users, especially young people. Governments have become more vigilant about the content on these platforms, leading to an increase in regulations and legal proceedings. Initially viewed as innocent sources of entertainment, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter (now X) are at risk of becoming a sort of "public enemy" accused of various wrongdoings. Conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza have exposed many of the issues related to freedom and censorship. Health experts' studies are not encouraging for those addicted to social media. The hits keep coming. The latest one comes from the United States. A group of 42 state attorneys general in the United States has filed a lawsuit against Meta Platforms due to features that create addiction designed for children and teenagers, their offices announced, as reported by CNBC. The support from so many state attorneys general from different political backgrounds indicates a significant legal challenge for Meta, which now faces multiple lawsuits on this issue in various counties. Attorneys general from 33 states have filed a federal lawsuit against Meta in the Northern District of California, while nine other attorneys general are filing complaints in their own states, according to a press release from New York Attorney General Letitia James. These lawsuits are another demonstration of the bipartisan priority that legal authorities place on protecting children and teenagers from online harm. It's not the first time a broad coalition of state attorneys general has teamed up to sue Meta. In 2020, 48 states and territories sued the company on antitrust grounds, along with a separate complaint from the Federal Trade Commission.

Meta designed its products, Facebook and Instagram, to keep young users on them longer and to keep them coming back repeatedly, according to the prosecutors. According to the federal complaint, Meta did this through the design of its algorithms, numerous alerts, notifications, and the so-called infinite scrolling through the platform's feeds. The company also includes features that prosecutors claim have a negative impact on the mental health of teenagers through social comparison or the promotion of body dysmorphia, such as "likes" or photo filters. The federal lawsuit accuses Meta of violating the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) by collecting personal data about users under 13 years old without parental consent. The states seek to end what they see as harmful practices by Meta, as well as sanctions and compensation. The company was aware of the negative effects its design could have on its young users, prosecutors claim.

According to a statement from Letitia James, "While Meta has publicly denied and downplayed these harmful effects, it cannot credibly plead ignorance. Meta's internal research documents show that it is aware that its products harm young users. Indeed, internal studies commissioned by Meta - and kept private until they were disclosed by a whistleblower and reported publicly - reveal that Meta has known for years about these serious harms associated with young users' time on its platforms." A former Facebook employee, Frances Haugen, stirred controversy among lawmakers and parents in 2021 after leaking internal company documents that revealed internal research on its products. A set of documents on the impact of Instagram on teenagers found that "thirty-two percent of teenage girls said that when they feel bad about their bodies, Instagram makes them feel worse," as reported by The Wall Street Journal before Haugen revealed her identity. Following the article, Instagram said it was working on ways to steer users away from focusing on negative topics. Some of the practices that prosecutors are focusing on in the Meta case are similar to those exercised by other social media companies, such as designing algorithms to keep users engaged. States that have filed the federal lawsuit include California, Colorado, Louisiana, Nebraska, New York, South Carolina, Washington, and Wisconsin.

CE investigates Meta and TikTok for spreading "false information" and "illegal content"

The European Commission (EC) has announced an investigation into the social media platforms Meta (Facebook, Instagram) and TikTok and is seeking clarification on measures they implement against the dissemination of "false information" and "illegal content" after the attack by the Palestinian Islamist movement Hamas in Israel on October 7. The EC states in a press release that it has sent an official request for information to these two platforms. It initiated a similar procedure a week ago against X, the former Twitter, under new legislation related to digital services (DSA). Facebook's owner, Meta Platforms, has introduced temporary measures to limit "possible inappropriate or unwanted comments" on posts related to the conflict between Israel and Hamas, as reported by Reuters. Meta said it would change the default setting for people who can comment on new public Facebook posts created by users "from the region" to only their friends and followers. A company spokesperson declined to specify how the company defined the region but said users could opt out and change the setting at any time. The social media company also announced it would disable the ability to view the first one or two comments on posts while scrolling through the Facebook feed. "Our policies are designed to keep people safe on our apps while also upholding everyone's right to express themselves. We apply these policies consistently worldwide, and there is no truth to the suggestion that we are deliberately suppressing freedom of expression," Meta said. Some users who posted in support of the citizens of Palestine or Gaza accused Meta of suppressing their content. Meta designates Hamas as a "dangerous organization" and bans content that praises the group. Other Instagram users reported that their posts and stories about Palestine received no views.

-------------

X, formerly known as Twitter, has officially become the subject of the first investigation carried out by the European Union following the adoption of new legislation on digital services. The European Union announced that it has launched an official investigation into X for the spread of illegal content and false information, including terrorist propaganda and incitement to hatred and violence. It is the first investigation of an online platform conducted by the European Union following the adoption of the Digital Services Act and comes shortly after a warning sent to X and Meta. With the official investigation underway, X has until October 31 to respond to several questions from authorities.

-------------

At the beginning of October, EU parliamentarians voted on rules that aim to restrict content moderation by Google, a subsidiary of Alphabet, Meta Platforms, and other major online platforms, after some media institutions complained about arbitrary decisions to remove their content, as reported by Reuters. The draft rules require online platforms to broadcast news content for 24 hours before removing it if it violates their content moderation rules. Known as Article 17 of the Press Freedom Act, the European Commission proposed the rule last year to ensure media plurality and protect editorial independence, but it raised concerns among online platforms. Media outlets should be "informed of the platform's intention to delete or restrict their content, along with a 24-hour window for the media to respond," said lawmakers in a statement. The platform can delete, restrict, or refer the case to national regulatory authorities after the 24-hour period if it still violates the platform's terms and conditions. The technology lobby group CCIA Europe, whose members include Google, Meta, and X, said Article 17 could be exploited by some to spread disinformation. Legislators voted to ban the use of spyware against journalists, except when it can be justified as a last resort, and also called for media transparency regarding ownership.

www.agerpres.ro
www.dreptonline.ro
www.hipo.ro

adb