Three names and one prime minister

The Prime Minister with three names has begun stammering - he admitted that the capping of the compensation at 15% which he is proposing, creates an injustice, but that he had to choose between making justice and ... Romania itself.

Say what?!

So, "Romania" and "justice" are not the same thing?!

How can a prime minister make such a statement?

It seems to me that the "education" which was claimed to be one of his undisputable assets, is actually just on the surface.

How can you promote the distinction between "justice" and "Romania", while at the same time being "a man of culture"?!

What kind of prime minister is the one who doesn't realize that by making that statement, he clearly publicly invalidates one of the provisions of the Constitution - Article 1(3) "Romania is a lawful state"?!

As a prime minister, you can't just pass a draft law which you are aware is unjust, regardless of your reasons.

I won't deny that the difference between the State's ability to pay the compensations and the amount it actually has to pay could lead to disaster, I am denying the intellectual abilities of Ungureanu, because he is expressing the issue in these inadequate terms.

Without any qualms whatsoever.

Really, I'm panicking.

In fact, he has access to the details of the problem, but he did not treat them seriously, but only enough to allow him to act maliciously against his predecessors: following the code of manners, Mihai Răzvan Ungureanu "apologized" in the name and on behalf of the previous governments, which were unable to come up with a clear and definitive solution to this problem, due to what he called "political camouflage".

Yes, such elegant behavior, he is such a gentleman!

In fact, the "unjustness" of the compensation measures, was clear from the very start, when the State began the restitutions, it hasn't only become so now, when it has sunk in that that the State can't compensate the victims "in integrum".

After all, what was called "The Mass Privatization Program" coincided with a "restitution" of 30% of the country's industry, to the adult population, by basically making 70% of what the Communist Constitution said was "the property of the entire people" the property of the State!.

The "cash" payments from the Budget, as compensation for the victims of the Communist Regime, represent an injustice against the taxpayers.

Had the Mass Privatization Program returned 100% of what the Communist Constitution had guaranteed to us, then yes, the compensations in cash made by the State Budget would have been fair.

I suspect that such a fair reasoning would have helped the adoption of the principle of "restitution in integrum".

Of course, the chaotic restitution process and the Proprietatea Fund illustrate the political self-serving (and the idiocy) of the post-government regimes, which have begun a compensation process, without assessing the amounts they would be required to pay, without showing a minimum required caution in managing the country, in a "devil may care" behavior.

Had he been right in the head, then the Prime Minister bearing three names would have announced that the people responsible for the mess that the country has been placed in through this compensation process are going to be prosecuted.

The nation wants justice.

The nation can't stand injustice.

Justice is the first thing that the country must have.

Had he been right in the head, the Prime Minister bearing three names would have announced that he has gotten in touch with the ECHR, to explain to them that we are in a very difficult situation (I think that the argument of the "world financial crisis" would be more useful with the ECHR, than with Romania's own citizens, when it comes to justifying the capping of the compensation at 15%), that we haven't been able to come up with a fair compensation, because we were led by various morons, under the consulting of clever foreign experts who did nothing useful.

However, Mihai Răzvan Ungureanu chose to speak like a gentleman, sarcastically, but in a distinguished manner, when discussing a dirty problem, acting as if he wasn't born in the right place, because he would have deserved to be the prime minister of Great Britain, not of this filthy country.

That's too bad for him.

He was just born in the wrong place.

The Prime Minister with three names spectacularly presented his governing program on the next day after his appointment as prime minister, leaving us stunned at his intellectual abilities (it is true however, that he now says he is going to sack Ovidu Blejnar, for failing to follow the Program which the PM claims he wrote in just one night and that he did not have sufficient information when he wrote it - well, who's going to inform you at night, man, when everybody is sound asleep?!; and as for Blejnar, there is no need to worry about him!, the bribes he can earn from the Large Fortune Verification Department are huge!).

The Prime Minister with three names swiftly privatizes Cupru Min, the people in the University Square protest against the suspected concession of our copper reserves. The Prime Minister is too quick in announcing that the privatization was a success - just like Mircea Geoană did in the elections - only to then do an about-face and say that the privatization failed because of technicalities.

All that was left was to dedicate the "successful" privatization to his wife, just like Geoană did.

The most undisputable achievement which Mihai Răzvan Ungureanu had is his verbal defeat of TV moderator Mihai Gâdea.

Other than that, it's just appearances and quackery.