Who do you vote with?

Life, through its fleeting tools, people, decided to return to the great battle of commuters like Mihai Bravul in Călugăreni, in a shirt and without any protective armor. In a rough translation, I walk steadily and purposefully on the bus and subway.

Like a deer that crossed the Sahara without an umbrella, I thirst for popular wisdom. I caught a slice of time well impregnated politically. Those who do not have headphones in their ears and are not hypnotized by screens (the 50+ generation) turn the future elections upside down. Word is coming. The parliamentary ones don't seem to be, the presidential ones squeeze all the passion out of the discussion. As a small part of the famous sociologists are easily self-suspended, for epidermal reasons, I said to get involved in the problem, bravely and without any competence, as befits a former career young man.

The first conclusion: the citizen is very tormented. He mixes things up to the point of dizziness and is merciless in epithets. Ciolacu is doing very well at the school of life, General Ciucă is...a general, Geoana is anointed with more ointments than can fit in a pharmacy, Mrs. Lasconi has courage and...only courage, Simion is from the people and an axe, Sosoacă will get many more votes than the CCR imagines and I can bear the ballots - which no longer include it, Orban takes notice, Hunor can handle his own, and Terheş, Diaconescu, Birchall, Georgescu, Predoiu, Păcuraru, Popescu, Mega, Constantinescu, Creţu have not entered, yet, in any discussion held in my proximity.

The second conclusion: the question "who do you vote with?" lock in a large majority of voters. Often they say "I don't know", and those who do give a name say it in such a way that you clearly notice the question mark at the end.

The third conclusion: the voter seems dissatisfied, and believes that he deserved more. how much It's hard to answer, but the members of the Academy seem to want candidates at least, if they can't be awarded the Nobel.

The last conclusion: the above conclusions are rather epidermal, they have no scientific value, but the experience so far tells us that even the stamp is not put on the ballot with who knows what science.