PREMIERUL DACIAN CIOLOŞ: "Ceva nu e în regulă cu bugetul prezentat de PSD, cineva a greşit la calcule"

Dacian Cioloş (Sursa foto: Facebook)

Prim-ministrul Dacian Cioloş a apreciat, într-un interviu acordat agenţiei de presă News.ro, că proiectul de buget prezentat de liderul PSD, Liviu Dragnea, este unul nesustenabil, argumentând că nu pot fi şi crescute şi veniturile, şi tăiate taxele, şi păstrat deficitul bugetar sub 3%.

Premierul a spus că datele pregătite de Ministerul Finanţelor pentru bugetul pe 2017 arată că nu există elemente pentru o estimare de creştere economică acum, în construcţia bugetului, de peste 5%, aşa cum a făcut PSD.

Cioloş a declarat, referitor la proiectul de buget prezentat miercuri de Liviu Dragnea: "Am văzut că PSD îşi propune să crească alocările bugetare la foarte multe ministere, să crească şi salariile. N-am văzut să introducă taxe noi, ci dimpotrivă se elimină anumite taxe conform Codului Fiscal, cum e TVA, taxa pe stâlp şi aşa mai departe. Şi, mai mult, îşi propun să menţină şi deficitul de sub 3%. Din calculele noastre, din ce mi-a arătat Ministerul de Finanţe pe estimările prezentate public de PSD, ceva nu e în regulă acolo. Ceva nu funcţionează. Sau deficitul ar trebui să fie de aproape 5% sau nu prea au cum să fie acoperite cheltuielile respective. Sau exagerează cu veniturile care ar putea fi".

Întrebat dacă i se pare sustenabil bugetul în viziunea PSD, şeful Guvernului a spus că sunt mai multe neconcordanţe: "Ceva nu e-n regulă acolo la calcule. Sau cineva a greşit la calcule sau el are la bază nişte indicatori nesustenabili".

În ceea ce priveşte propria proiecţie asupra bugetului pe 2017, prim-ministrul a afirmat că a pornit "de la nişte estimări realiste ale situaţiei în momentul de faţă", care au în vedere o creştere economică în jur de 4%.

Dacian Cioloş a mai vorbit despre o eventuală guvernare a PSD şi a precizat că un pericol pentru ţara noastră este să aibă o guvernare populistă, care să se bazeze pe minciună sau pe calcule nerealiste ale bugetului şi să pună presiune pe buget şi pe deficitul bugetar fără să stimuleze crearea de locuri de muncă şi creşterea economică sustenabilă.

În ceea ce priveşte declaraţiile făcute de prim-ministrul maghiar Viktor Orban, Cioloş l-a acuzat pe acesta că face declaraţii de campanie electorală, neelegante şi incorecte şi a afirmat că este surprins că "partea maghiară are o problemă cu Ziua Naţională a României acum, în acest an". El a mai spus că oficialii români au transmis pe canale diplomatice "toate mesajele" pe care le-au considerat necesare, dar nu vor să contribuie la "inflamarea în spaţiul public a unui astfel de gen de discuţii, mai ales într-o perioadă de campanie electorală".

Premierul Dacian Cioloş a comentat şi decizia Consiliului Naţional de Atestare a Titlurilor, Diplomelor şi Certificatelor Universitare (CNATDCU), care a stabilit că procurorul-şef al DNA, Laura Codruţa Kovesi, nu a plagiat în lucrarea de doctorat. Şeful Guvernului o consideră pertinentă, atât timp cât a fost luată de "o instituţie abilitată să facă acest lucru, cu oameni profesionişti, care sunt în măsură să îşi asume aceste decizii".

De asemenea, premierul a abordat şi subiectul proiectelor care în opinia sa trebuie neapărat continuate de viitoarea guvernare, spunând că prioritare rămân Sănătatea, cu investiţiile în spitale, Educaţia, cu accent pe pachetul antisărăcie şi reducerea abandonului şcolar, precum şi reforma adminisiraţiei publice.

Opinia Cititorului ( 7 )

1. Hai, pa!
(mesaj trimis de Sika în data de 10.12.2016, 06:25)
Lasă, băi, Cioloșe că nu e necesar să înțelegiu tu! De altfel, a te face pe tine să înțelegi e și o inutilă pierdere de timp sortită eșecului. Ce să-ți facem? Atâta poți tu!
Sper să dispari pentru totdeauna. Tu și vulpea care te-a adus. Adio!
1. 1.1.  Catre redactia Bursa (răspuns la opinia nr. 1)
  (mesaj trimis de anonim în data de 10.12.2016, 09:14)
  Dl Make sustine ca blocati aparitia a
  astfel de mesaje precum cel trimis
  la poz.1
  Poate afla si el care este traducerea in romana a cuvantului SIK ; de care vad ca e mandru
  1.2.  fără titlu (răspuns la opinia nr. 1.1)
  (mesaj trimis de anonim în data de 10.12.2016, 09:43)
  Chiar nu are nimeni curaj sa spuna adevarul? Nu am avea niciodata deficit daca statul si-ar prelua dreptul de a bate moneda..pentru dezvoltare..cred ca nu am mai avea creditori statali!
  1.3.  fără titlu (răspuns la opinia nr. 1.1)
  (mesaj trimis de didi în data de 10.12.2016, 12:50)
  Cunosc bine persoana care se intituleaza cu,,...numele de Sika....Va rog sa nu-l luati inseama....Make nu are de unde sa stie de ce sufera acea persoana,,,Va spun eu ..Sika are o vorbire si gandire dezorganizata care duce spre ...schizofrenie...asa ca nu-l bagati in seama....
2. Monstrul de la Maastricht
(mesaj trimis de Silvia în data de 10.12.2016, 08:56)
Salariul minim pe economie trebuie sa creasca nu sa fie desfiintat!
In ceea ce priveste deficitul e o mare gogorita inventata prin criteriile de la Maastricht..care fura statului dreptul regalian de a bate moneda. Cum e posibil ca tu stat national sa imprumuti de la privati...cand tu ai acest drept dat prin suveranitate sa bati moneda si sa imprumuti tu privatii..nu invers. Prin crearea FED in 1913 s-a creat aceasta molima...care este in contradictie cu articolul 3, din constitutia SUA. Cand J kennedy a semnalat acest fapt a fost lichidat! Iata cum prin moneda suntem controlati de marea finanta, privata.Cum sa tragi tu la arspunde factorul politic atunci cand vinovatii sunt cei care ne controleaza prin diferite instrumente...din prostie sau hotie se fac jocurile acestor papusari. Acest lucru trebuie corectat primul si apoi se vor regla toatae celelalte. Ceausescu a fost lichidat pentru ca lasat tara fara datorii si avea drept proiect crearea unei bani care sa imprumute alte tari...
1. 2.1. manipulare si control prin moneda (răspuns la opinia nr. 2)
  (mesaj trimis de Happy Hipo Show în data de 10.12.2016, 09:23)
  President John F.Kennedy,
  The Federal Reserve
  And Executive Order 11110
  
  by Cedric X
  From The Final Call, Vol. 15, No.6, On January 17, 1996
  On June 4, 1963, a little known attempt was made to strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the government at interest. On that day President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110 that returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve. Mr. Kennedy's order gave the Treasury the power "to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury." This meant that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation. In all, Kennedy brought nearly $4.3 billion in U.S. notes into circulation. The ramifications of this bill are enormous.
  With the stroke of a pen, Mr. Kennedy was on his way to putting the Federal Reserve Bank of New York out of business. If enough of these silver certificats were to come into circulation they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve notes. This is because the silver certificates are backed by silver and the Federal Reserve notes are not backed by anything. Executive Order 11110 could have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level, because it would have given the gevernment the ability to repay its debt without going to the Federal Reserve and being charged interest in order to create the new money. Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S. the ability to create its own money backed by silver.
  After Mr. Kennedy was assassinated just five months later, no more silver certificates were issued. The Final Call has learned that the Executive Order was never repealed by any U.S. President through an Executive Order and is still valid. Why then has no president utilized it? Virtually all of the nearly $6 trillion in debt has been created since 1963, and if a U.S. president had utilized Executive Order 11110 the debt would be nowhere near the current level. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to future presidents who would think to eliminate the U.S. debt by eliminating the Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. Mr. Kennedy challenged the government of money by challenging the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt - war and the creation of money by a privately-owned central bank. His efforts to have all troops out of Vietnam by 1965 and Executive Order 11110 would have severely cut into the profits and control of the New York banking establishment. As America's debt reaches unbearable levels and a conflict emerges in Bosnia that will further increase America's debt, one is force to ask, will President Clinton have the courage to consider utilizing Executive Order 11110 and, ifso, is he willing to pay the ultimate price for doing so?
  Executive Order 11110 AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289
  AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
  By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:
  Section 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended-
  By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j):
  (j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12,1933, as amended (31 U.S.C.821(b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denomination of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption
  and --
  Byrevoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.
  Sec. 2. The amendments made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.
  John F. Kennedy The White House, June 4, 1963.
  Of course, the fact that both JFK and Lincoln met the the same end is a mere coincidence.
  Abraham Lincoln's Monetary Policy, 1865 (Page 91 of Senate document 23.)
  Money is the creature of law and the creation of the original issue of money should be maintained as the exclusive monopoly of national Government.
  Money possesses no value to the State other than that given to it by circulation.
  Capital has its proper place and is entitled to every protection. The wages of men should be recognised in the structure of and in the social order as more important than the wages of money.
  No duty is more imperative for the Government than the duty it owes the People to furnish them with a sound and uniform currency, and of regulating the circulation of the medium of exchange so that labour will be protected from a vicious currency, and commerce will be facilitated by cheap and safe exchanges.
  The available supply of Gold and Silver being wholly inadequate to permit the issuance of coins of intrinsic value or paper currency convertible into coin in the volume required to serve the needs of the People, some other basis for the issue of currency must be developed, and some means other than that of convertibility into coin must be developed to prevent undue fluctuation in the value of paper currency or any other substitute for money of intrinsic value that may come into use.
  The monetary needs of increasing numbers of People advancing towards higher standards of living can and should be met by the Government. Such needs can be served by the issue of National Currency and Credit through the operation of a National Banking system .The circulation of a medium of exchange issued and backed by the Government can be properly regulated and redundancy of issue avoided by withdrawing from circulation such amounts as may be necessary by Taxation, Redeposit, and otherwise. Government has the power to regulate the currency and creditof the Nation.
  Government should stand behind its currency and credit and the Bank deposits of the Nation. No individual should suffer a loss of money through depreciation or inflated currency or Bank bankruptcy.
  Government possessing the power to create and issue currency and creditas money and enjoying the right to withdraw both currency and credit from circulation by Taxation and otherwise need not and should not borrow capital at interest as a means of financing Governmental work and public enterprise. The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of the consumers. The privilege of creating and issueing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, but it is the Governments greatest creative opportunity.
  By the adoption of these principles the long felt want for a uniform medium will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest, discounts, and exchanges. The financing of all public enterprise, the maintenance of stable Government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. The people can and will be furnished with a currency as safe as their own Government. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the money power.
  Some information on the Federal Reserve The Federal Reserve, a Private Corporation One of the most common concerns among people who engage in any effort to reduce their taxes is, "Will keeping my money hurt the government's ability to pay it's bills?" As explained in the first article in this series, the modern withholding tax does not, and wasn't designed to, pay for government services. What it does do, is pay for the privately-owned Federal Reserve System.
  Black's Law Dictionary defines the "Federal Reserve System" as, "Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum reserves."
  Privately-owned banks own the stock of the Fed. This was explained in more detail in the case of Lewis v. United States, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241 (1982), where the court said:
  Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region. The stock-holding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank's nine member board of directors.
  Similarly, the Federal Reserve Banks, though heavily regulated, are locally controlled by their member banks. Taking another look at Black's Law Dictionary, we find that these privately owned banks actually issue money:
  Federal Reserve Act. Law which created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks, and supervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.).
  The FED banks, which are privately owned, actually issue, that is, create, the money we use. In 1964 the House Committee on Banking and Currency, Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second session of the 88th Congress, put out a study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what the FED is:
  The Federal Reserve is a total money-making machine.It can issue money or checks. And it never has a problem of making its checks good because it can obtain the $5 and $10 bills necessary to cover its check simply by asking the Treasury Department's Bureau of Engraving to print them.
  As we all know, anyone who has a lot of money has a lot of power. Now imagine a group of people who have the power to create money. Imagine the power these people would have. This is what the Fed is.
  No man did more to expose the power of the Fed than Louis T. McFadden, who was the Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. Constantly pointing out that monetary issues shouldn't be partisan, he criticized both the Herbert Hoover and Franklin Roosevelt administrations. In describing the Fed, he remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932, that:
  Mr. Chairman,we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enoughmoney to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the UnitedStates; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.
  Some people think the Federal reserve banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders. In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into States to buy votes to control our legislation; and there are those who maintain an international propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us and of wheedling us into the granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this country by bankers who camehere from Europe and who repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions.
  The Fed basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to the Fed banks. They create money, then loan it back to the government charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt. On this point, it's interesting to note that the Federal Reserve act and the sixteenth amendment, which gave congress the power to collect income taxes, were both passed in 1913. The incredible power of the Fed over the economy is universally admitted. Some people, especially in the banking and academic communities, even support it. On the other hand, there are those, both in the past and in the present, that speak out against it. One of these men was President John F. Kennedy. His efforts were detailed in Jim Marrs' 1990 book, Crossfire:
  Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11,110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.
  Kennedy's comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks.
  A number of "Kennedy bills" were indeed issued - the author has a five dollar bill in his possession with the heading "United States Note" - but were quickly withdrawn after Kennedy's death. According to information from the Library of the Comptroller of the Currency, Executive Order 11,110 remains in effect today, although successive administrations beginning with that of President Lyndon Johnson apparently have simply ignored it and instead returned to the practice of paying interest on Federal Reserve notes. Today we continue to use Federal Reserve Notes, and the deficit is at an all-time high.
  The point being made is that the IRS taxes you pay aren't used for government services. It won't hurt you, or the nation, to legally reduce or eliminate your tax liability.
3. fără titlu
(mesaj trimis de Cristi C în data de 10.12.2016, 14:29)
Încerc să înțeleg ce face Ministerul de Finanțe, o instituție publică, la cererea lui Cioloș, un candidat în campanie electorală.

"Din calculele noastre, din ce mi-a arătat Ministerul de Finanţe pe estimările prezentate public de PSD, ceva nu e în regulă acolo. "

Cioloș cred că tocmai poate fi acuzat de ABUZ ÎN SERVICIU. Iar DNA ar face bine să pregătească un dosar penal.

Cioloș a abuzat de autoritatea funcției de prim-ministru pentru a cere Ministerului de Finanțe să analizeze un program electoral al contracandidaților lui la alegerile parlamentare.

ATENȚIE MARE. Programul PSD este unul de viitor (și poate minciună electorală). Nu reprezintă un atac asupra unor acțiuni executate de Guvern care ar fi cerut dreptul la replică al lui Cioloș. Programul PSD este unul de tipul "pe viitor, când vom crește cu atât, vom face asta".

NU ESTE MENIREA MINISTERULUI DE FINANȚE să revizuiască programele electorale ale partidelor aflate în competiție. Cioloș tocmai a devenit un politician penal pentru ABUZ ÎN SERVICIU.

Hai Kovesi, arată ce poți.