FOLLOWING THE BECHTEL MODEL Requiem at Roşia Montană

ALEXANDRA CRĂCIUN (Translated by Cosmin Ghidoveanu)
Ziarul BURSA #English Section / 11 septembrie 2013

Requiem at Roşia Montană

Who will foot the bill?

All the ministers in the Ponta government and the president of the PNL Crin Antonescu have agreed to the Roşia Montană project, according to yesterday's statements by the prime minister.

"In the Government, absolutely everybody has given their approval. I have also talked to Mr. Antonescu, on Friday as well, but as for the political decision made on Monday (ed. note: by which the President of the National Liberal Party (PNL) has expressed his rejection of the project) I acknowledge it and respect it", the prime minister said.

Who or what has made Crin Antonescu change his mind over the week-end, so that on Monday morning he would be so adamantly against the project?

Some analysts claim that this is the beginning of the end for the USL, which will probably fall apart after the elections for the European parliament.

Crin Antonescu may have been told that PSD will have his own candidate for the presidential elections which will be held next year, which means that PNL will leave the government. Crin Antonescu would have to be increasingly popular to avoid having another liberal presidential candidate overtake him in terms of credibility. And it would seem that he has chosen the right hand to play - the exploitation of Roşia Montană, an extremely sensitive topic among Romanians. Yesterday's decision to oppose the project may have brought him lots of additional votes.

But the prime-minister isn't sitting idly by, twiddling his thumbs. Instead, he is coming out with "shocking" statements: we may be forced to pay over 2 billion Euros in damages, or the rejection of the Roşia Montană project will lead to "the wiping of the Alba county from the economic map".

Last night, however, Victor Ponta said, in his characteristic style, that,

"as a deputy", he would vote against the project.

Meanwhile, in University Square, people are still protesting.

Negative vote of the Legal Commission of the Senate

The Legal Commission of the Senate yesterday gave a negative vote on the gold mining project of Roşia Montană. Essentially, this signs the death sentence for the gold mining project in the Apuseni mountains. Most likely, the authorities may cancel the contract with Gabriel Resources, the company that holds the controlling interest in the project.

The draft law concerning the mining exploitation of Roşia Montană also received a negative vote from the Commission for Public Administration, the territorial organization and the protection of the environment in the Senate and from the Legal Commission in the Senate.

The implications of these negative opinions from the parliament when it comes to the gold mining operation at Roşia Montană are varied, but the "hot" question which currently arises, and which nobody has an answer to yet, is the following: "What is all this talk about the canceling of the contract based on?"

BURSA has announced since yesterday, that according to some market sources, the entire scenario has been " premeditated" since the beginning of the year, when the price of gold fell far enough that the Roşia Montană project would be considered unprofitable.

Besides, Gabriel Resources has "predicted" this scenario in its quarterly reports of 2013, in which it discloses the risks of the project and the potential solutions.

One of the reports states that the halting of the review of the Environmental Impact Assessment of Roşia Montană by the Ministry of the Environment in September 2007 (a process which was later resumed in September 2010) shows the significant risks that the project is faced with.

"These kinds of risks can affect the ability of the Group (Gabriel Resources and its subsidiaries) to go on and can result in obstacles or in the total or partial loss of the assets of the Group", the document in question states.

Furthermore, on March 31st, 2013, Gabriel Resources had no operational cashflow resource and did not have enough cash to finance the development of the project and therefore needed additional resources, which, if they are not raised, could result in a contraction of operations and in the delay of the project, according to the quarterly report of the company. At the time, the Group (Gabriel and its subsidiaries) had 0.9 million Canadian dollars in the Romanian banks (about 900.000 US dollars).

2 billion Euros in damages

The Romanian state would have to pay about two billion Euros in damages, if the mining project of Roşia Montană gets cancelled, to Gabriel Resources, the majority shareholder of the gold mining project, according to yesterday's statements by prime-minister Victor Ponta. "The amount in question demanded by the company comprises the expenses it has incurred so far and the potential trade losses", the prime minister said, and he went on to say that Romania will most likely have to deal with a lawsuit for damages filed by Gabriel Resources.

He said that if such a lawsuits gets filed by Gabriel Resources, the Romanian state will defend itself.

According to the statements of the prime minister, there is a commercial license which was granted in 1999 to Roşia Montana Gold Corporation, and the delegated minister for major projects, Dan Şova, would give more details on the subject today.

Investment fund iFond Gold (IFG) has announced yesterday that following the announcement that the law for the mining exploitation of Roşia Montană would not be approved in the Parliament, in order to protect the investors' interests, it has pared down its exposure to the shares of Gabriel Resources by selling 25,000 shares, which represented approximately 26.77% of the total number of shares owned by IFG in Gabriel Resources, at the average price of 0.7972 CAD.

The closed-end fund iFond Gold had a holding of 93,400 shares of Gabriel Resources (TSX:GBU), representing 34.55% of the fund's total assets.

Readers' reaction

The article published yesterday, called "The final stake in the Roşia Montană case -

The final stake in the Roşia Montană case - several billion dollars in damages?" has caused numerous reactions among the readers of the BURSA newspaper, leading to a veritable debate on the website of our newspaper, concerning the gold mining project in the Apuseni mountains. One of the readers, signing with the nickname "Theraflu", says: "If someone were to pore over the original contract with all of its amendments there would be plenty of reasons for it to be cancelled and those responsible for this scam and others related to it to be punished. Those who have worked for RMGC know how obvious it was that this blank contract was intended to allow the sale of Romania's strategic resources in the last 24 years. Why should every Romanian pay 100 Euros when the thieves and the corrupt who have concluded and developed this contract could be developed? Honestly, I think that Roşia Montană is the tip of an iceberg that could be exploited traditionally using today's technologies and with many benefits for the region. If we were to exploit that gold deposit in a reckless < it doesn't matter what happens when we're done > or < we're going to mine it and that's final! > manner, we will be destroying the future of this country. At any rate, that gold has only brought woe to the inhabitants of those areas so far, perhaps it is time it brought them durable development, not just a flood of cyanide in the midst of a piece of heaven that is the cradle of the old Dacian state that collapsed due to the foreigners' greed. Aren't we going to ever learn something from our history? Back then, there was a traitor named Bastus and now there are several, an entire network of traitors and thieves. Haven't we learned anything from Vlad Ţepeş about how these thieves should be punished?

We need to send a clear signal abroad: < Romania is not for sale, Romania is for development! If it's for sale, the foreigners will print as many green papers as it takes to buy it! Our gold is not for sale, our land is not for sale, our energy resources are not for sale, our forests are not for sale - everything needs to stay here to support the economy and the citizens of this country, rather than other economies. We still have enough resources that shouldn't be sold in exchange for monetary illusions".

Another reader that calls himself "anonymous" says that he doesn't understand why do Romanians right away feel like they "should" compensate anyone who asks for it: "This is a project (ed. note: Roşia Montană) that involved risks and they (the investors) knew that. It simply hasn't been approved and they have accepted that risk".

Many of the readers have raised the question of the alleged unorthodox methods by which the company from the Jersey off-shore region has managed to secure the mining license for Roşia Montană, as well as that of the involvement of some high ranking officials in Romania, not just politicians, but from the banking sector as well, which have given Gabriel Resources and investment funds the help they needed to seize Romania's mineral resources.

One thing is for certain though: no one thought that the scenario according to which the end goal of the scandal was nothing more but allowing Gabriel Resources Jersey to make an "honorable" exit from the gold mining project in the Apuseni mountains, following the "Bechtel" model, richer with several billions in damages, on top of the money it has raised on the Toronto Stock Exchange over the last 15 years.

www.agerpres.ro
www.dreptonline.ro
www.hipo.ro

adb